At AMWA 2018, a hundred or so health and medical communicators gathered in Melbourne for two days to explore the theory behind the concept of integrity in medical communication.
Delegates from Australia and New Zealand heard from science communicators, journal editors, news reporters, content marketers and business owners about how to maintain integrity in challenging fields – from commercial organisations to highly-regulated environments.
Here are some of the key take-homes from AMWA 2018: integrity in a post-truth world.
Keynote Dr Andrew Stapleton, science communicator and founder of verbalize.science, gave a blatantly honest account of his career and how he found his authentic voice by disrupting traditional science communication.
Andrew said that the way to maintain integrity in a post-truth world is to be authentic, share the science story, celebrate the people behind the science, be consistent with content, be brave and take risks.
Great opening by Andy @andyjstapleton with excellent advice for #scicomm #AMWA2018 pic.twitter.com/lMci6SPHj3
— Jocelyne Basseal (@JocelyneBasseal) August 23, 2018
Speaking on behalf of the Centre for Culture, Ethnicity & Health, Jolyon Burford discussed the importance of involving consumers in the process of preparing information.
Health literacy is both environmental and individual, Jolyon argued, and dropping jargon is critical to improving health literacy in vulnerable groups.
Joylon Burford highlights the issues facing Australia’s medical writers #AMWA2018 @AusMedWriters #scicomm pic.twitter.com/X9d9KSZjJG
— Dr Andy Stapleton (@andyjstapleton) August 23, 2018
Professor David Bishop, an applied sport scientist and research leader from the Institute of Sport, Exercise and Active Living at Victoria University, presented arguably the most powerful and emotional presentation of the meeting.
David created an emotional storyboard based on a children’s book to showcase various ethical issues in conducting and interpreting research.
David advised looking at study methods to verify the believability of a trial and checking the preregistration of clinical trials as a way of spotting any potential ethical issues.
Look deeper into the data #amwa2018 pic.twitter.com/dHeDA8jFys
— AMWA (@AusMedWriters) August 24, 2018
Too often we write documents for ourselves, not our ideal readers. Tamika Heiden from Knowledge Translation Australia spoke about why understanding your audience is vital for meeting audience needs.
Repeating someone’s words in their language shows you understand, Tamika said.
To have empathy, we need to listen and learn from others. We need to believe what others are telling us. #amwa2018 pic.twitter.com/dLsjCL7pGk
— Sarah Morton (@sarahmortoncopy) August 24, 2018
A panel discussion on ethical medical writing covered issues about accessing journal papers, GP education via industry and pharmaceutical companies and how to refuse work that raises ethical dilemmas.
Medical writers have a lot of power, the panel agreed, and it’s our obligation to speak up if we notice anything unethical.
Also, the point was made: just because a practice is legal does not mean it is ethical.
We all make mistakes – and, even large publishers with rigid fact-checking processes will mess up from time to time.
Signe Dean, the Editor of the hugely popular ScienceAlert website, shared an insight into ScienceAlert’s specialty fact-checking process and discussed how to check facts as a separate piece of work to the writing process.
In showcasing some of ScienceAlert’s past factual errors and typos, Signe’s message was clear: accept your errors, correct them, apologise and move on.
More fact-checking tips #AMWA2018 @nevertoocurious @ScienceAlert pic.twitter.com/dMaqcSQ13f
— AMWA (@AusMedWriters) August 24, 2018
Dr Leanne Downing from Affect Media Public Relations and a lecturer at the School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, explored content marketing and integrity with a heavy focus on healthcare professional marketing guidelines.
Leanne highlighted what can go wrong if writers don’t help their clients adhere to these guidelines.
Leanne also gave us tips to maintain integrity, including clarifying our go/no-go process on projects, identifying client intent and expectations upfront and explaining the legislative environment to new clients.
Dr Tania Dickson from the Envision Pharma Group spoke about ethical publications.
Tania said that patients are becoming savvier and taking the time to read publications to make shared decisions with their clinician.
Tania also argued that plain language summaries are becoming more popular, as they help patients understand clinical trials and research. As a result, industries are involving patients in the development of clinical study protocols.
In closing her session, Tanya had an inspirational message to share: medical writers are not just scribes. We’re a valued partner in the publication process and a font of knowledge for ethical publishing.
We are the gatekeepers of ethical publication practices (and ethical medical writing in general) and we need to step up and own our roles.
Great examples of why we medical writers are so useful! #AMWA2018 pic.twitter.com/s4BjmPd7n8
— Dr Sarah McKay (@SarahMMcKay) August 25, 2018
Some of the common themes to emerge from the other sessions and workshops of the meeting include:
Next time people ask me about how I reached where I am in my career, I’m just gonna show ’em this slide by Lyn Airey from GrantEd Group. #AMWA2018 pic.twitter.com/Xz08NEIW8d
— Signe Dean (@nevertoocurious) August 25, 2018